FRRpart3 - Revision history

Tyciol: creating a back button

2014-07-08T08:07:12Z

creating a back button

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:07, 8 July 2014
Line 1,014:		Line 1,014:
	this seems to fit a pre-Renaissance era. Again, FATAL seems historically accurate.</p>		this seems to fit a pre-Renaissance era. Again, FATAL seems historically accurate.</p>
	----		----
	[[FRRpart4\|Go to part 4]]		[[FRRpart2\|Go to part 2]] - [[FRRpart4\|Go to part 4]]

2011-04-23T13:31:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:31, 23 April 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Part 3 of the FATAL Review Rebuttal. --[[User:Knockwood\|Lord Knockwood the Mad]]		Part 3/5 of the FATAL Review Rebuttal. --[[User:Knockwood\|Lord Knockwood the Mad]]
	----		----
	<blockquote>		<blockquote>

2009-08-15T12:10:53Z

Reverted edits by 193.210.145.86 (Talk); changed back to last version by 206.116.113.197

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:10, 15 August 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	* [http://geteltcn.com/bocdronmonc.html viricviace]
	~~http://rolrac.com/ologetzels.html[viricviace] [[http://rolrac.com/ologetzels.html][viricviace]]~~
	* http://clireltatr.com/cnasitl.html viricviace
	* [[http://c4telcacco.com/trocdelc.html viricviace]]
	* [[http://paseltlicali.com/domacelracc.html\|viricviace]]
	* [[http://deleld.com/erpastra.html \| viricviace]]
	* [http://bocrac.com/basrold.html\|viricviace]
	* [viricviace\|http://alboortroco.com/delalnoch.html]
	* ((http://lialrob.com/liortro.html viricviace))
	* [viricviace](http://getcoletomon.com/ornolierr.html "viricviace")
	~~"viricviace":http://cobono.com/ractrocli.html~~

	Part 3 of the FATAL Review Rebuttal. --[[User:Knockwood\|Lord Knockwood the Mad]]		Part 3 of the FATAL Review Rebuttal. --[[User:Knockwood\|Lord Knockwood the Mad]]
	----		----

2009-08-15T11:11:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:11, 15 August 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
			* [http://geteltcn.com/bocdronmonc.html viricviace]
			http://rolrac.com/ologetzels.html[viricviace] [[http://rolrac.com/ologetzels.html][viricviace]]
			* http://clireltatr.com/cnasitl.html viricviace
			* [[http://c4telcacco.com/trocdelc.html viricviace]]
			* [[http://paseltlicali.com/domacelracc.html\|viricviace]]
			* [[http://deleld.com/erpastra.html \| viricviace]]
			* [http://bocrac.com/basrold.html\|viricviace]
			* [viricviace\|http://alboortroco.com/delalnoch.html]
			* ((http://lialrob.com/liortro.html viricviace))
			* [viricviace](http://getcoletomon.com/ornolierr.html "viricviace")
			"viricviace":http://cobono.com/ractrocli.html

	Part 3 of the FATAL Review Rebuttal. --[[User:Knockwood\|Lord Knockwood the Mad]]		Part 3 of the FATAL Review Rebuttal. --[[User:Knockwood\|Lord Knockwood the Mad]]
	----		----

2008-08-20T23:17:15Z

linked to archive.org page of FAQ article, for posterity

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:17, 20 August 2008
Line 493:		Line 493:
	they've gone through...maybe fifteen books at the absolute most, and that's being awfully		they've gone through...maybe fifteen books at the absolute most, and that's being awfully
	generous. So, as a result, whenever you come to the conclusion that it's incredibly		generous. So, as a result, whenever you come to the conclusion that it's incredibly
	sexist, you can entertain yourself with a [http://www.fatalgames.com/~~faqsexism~~.html confusing, obscurantist bit of pseudoscholarship] that basically suggests that it's your problem that there isn't a		sexist, you can entertain yourself with a [http://web.archive.org/web/20021029143551/www.fatalgames.com/fatalfaqsexism.html confusing, obscurantist bit of pseudoscholarship] that basically suggests that it's your problem that there isn't a
	single spot in FATAL that refers to women as anything but whores. For a bit of fun, you		single spot in FATAL that refers to women as anything but whores. For a bit of fun, you
	could go through and counterpoint every single lame point he makes with about a hundred		could go through and counterpoint every single lame point he makes with about a hundred

2007-11-02T13:57:13Z

Reverted edits by 148.167.202.141 (Talk); changed back to last version by Knockwood

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:57, 2 November 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~rolsit~~
	Part 3 of the FATAL Review Rebuttal. --[[User:Knockwood\|Lord Knockwood the Mad]]		Part 3 of the FATAL Review Rebuttal. --[[User:Knockwood\|Lord Knockwood the Mad]]
	----		----

2007-11-02T10:49:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:49, 2 November 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
			rolsit
	Part 3 of the FATAL Review Rebuttal. --[[User:Knockwood\|Lord Knockwood the Mad]]		Part 3 of the FATAL Review Rebuttal. --[[User:Knockwood\|Lord Knockwood the Mad]]
	----		----

2005-06-18T11:42:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:42, 18 June 2005
Line 493:		Line 493:
	they've gone through...maybe fifteen books at the absolute most, and that's being awfully		they've gone through...maybe fifteen books at the absolute most, and that's being awfully
	generous. So, as a result, whenever you come to the conclusion that it's incredibly		generous. So, as a result, whenever you come to the conclusion that it's incredibly
	sexist, you can entertain yourself with a [http://www.fatalgames.com/faqsexism.html confusing, obscurantist bit of		sexist, you can entertain yourself with a [http://www.fatalgames.com/faqsexism.html confusing, obscurantist bit of pseudoscholarship] that basically suggests that it's your problem that there isn't a
	pseudoscholarship] that basically suggests that it's your problem that there isn't a
	single spot in FATAL that refers to women as anything but whores. For a bit of fun, you		single spot in FATAL that refers to women as anything but whores. For a bit of fun, you
	could go through and counterpoint every single lame point he makes with about a hundred		could go through and counterpoint every single lame point he makes with about a hundred

2005-06-18T11:14:32Z

part 3 of the infamous rebuttal