Talk:4SRD:Main Page - Revision history

Tallifer at 00:10, 9 June 2012

2012-06-09T00:10:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:10, 9 June 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I think we can be bolder and more in the spirit of our beloved edition. Therefore I have started downloading and editing the 3.5 SRD to make it more like the Fourth Edition. The resultant document will not be nearly as clean and elegant as the actual Fourth Edition Players' Handbook, but with plentiful links it should not matter.		I think we can be bolder and more in the spirit of our beloved edition. Therefore I have started downloading and editing the 3.5 SRD to make it more like the Fourth Edition. The resultant document will not be nearly as clean and elegant as the actual Fourth Edition Players' Handbook, but with plentiful links it should not matter.

	I think the important thing is to preserve the core rules such as Healing Surges, Non-armour Class Defenses, Powers and other such stuff. We can rename them all ~~if people are nervous~~, ~~but~~ I think that a small-scale and non-profit project like this should not attract legal action.		I think the important thing is to preserve the core rules such as Healing Surges, Non-armour Class Defenses, Powers and other such stuff. We can rename them all to avoid trouble, and I think that a small-scale and non-profit project like this should not attract legal action.

	Sincerely, Tallifer		Sincerely, Tallifer

Tallifer at 05:02, 2 June 2012

2012-06-02T05:02:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:02, 2 June 2012
Line 4:		Line 4:

	I think the important thing is to preserve the core rules such as Healing Surges, Non-armour Class Defenses, Powers and other such stuff. We can rename them all if people are nervous, but I think that a small-scale and non-profit project like this should not attract legal action.		I think the important thing is to preserve the core rules such as Healing Surges, Non-armour Class Defenses, Powers and other such stuff. We can rename them all if people are nervous, but I think that a small-scale and non-profit project like this should not attract legal action.

			Sincerely, Tallifer

Tallifer: Created page with "My interest here is renewed since the Fifth edition looks less and less like the Fourth Edition. I think we can be bolder and more in the spirit of our beloved edition. Therefor..."

2012-06-02T05:01:40Z

Created page with "My interest here is renewed since the Fifth edition looks less and less like the Fourth Edition. I think we can be bolder and more in the spirit of our beloved edition. Therefor..."

New page

My interest here is renewed since the Fifth edition looks less and less like the Fourth Edition.

I think we can be bolder and more in the spirit of our beloved edition. Therefore I have started downloading and editing the 3.5 SRD to make it more like the Fourth Edition. The resultant document will not be nearly as clean and elegant as the actual Fourth Edition Players' Handbook, but with plentiful links it should not matter.

I think the important thing is to preserve the core rules such as Healing Surges, Non-armour Class Defenses, Powers and other such stuff. We can rename them all if people are nervous, but I think that a small-scale and non-profit project like this should not attract legal action.