Talk:HorizonVirtual:Area And Distance In Program Space - Revision history

Igtenio at 01:23, 19 June 2005

2005-06-19T01:23:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:23, 19 June 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~I would also like to add that I think the Weight Factor is off, as well.~~

	~~The average White Male between 20 and 30 is about 168 pounds. In Virtual, the factor given is 1 Kilogram = One Byte of Code. Therefore, the average Userclone Waker would be 76 Kilograms.~~

	This's unacceptable. That means that a Waker takes up 76 Bytes of Code. As an example of how small this is, the Calculator program in Windows 2000 is 89 Kilobytes. Meaning that the Calculator takes up well over a thousand times more coding then a sentient program(1 Kilobyte Equals 1,024 Bytes, meaning that the calculator takes up roughly 91,136 bytes). That's nucking futs. I'd find it more acceptable to say that One Kilogram equals roughly 500 Kilobytes of coding. Meaning that the average Userclone Waker would take up a more respectable rough estimate of 38 Megabytes.

Igtenio at 09:26, 16 June 2005

2005-06-16T09:26:54Z

New page

I would also like to add that I think the Weight Factor is off, as well.

The average White Male between 20 and 30 is about 168 pounds. In Virtual, the factor given is 1 Kilogram = One Byte of Code. Therefore, the average Userclone Waker would be 76 Kilograms.

This's unacceptable. That means that a Waker takes up 76 Bytes of Code. As an example of how small this is, the Calculator program in Windows 2000 is 89 Kilobytes. Meaning that the Calculator takes up well over a thousand times more coding then a sentient program(1 Kilobyte Equals 1,024 Bytes, meaning that the calculator takes up roughly 91,136 bytes). That's nucking futs. I'd find it more acceptable to say that One Kilogram equals roughly 500 Kilobytes of coding. Meaning that the average Userclone Waker would take up a more respectable rough estimate of 38 Megabytes.