Talk:HorizonVirtual:Wakers - Revision history

Igtenio: /* Waker Lifespans */

2005-06-21T09:35:01Z

Waker Lifespans

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:35, 21 June 2005
Line 14:		Line 14:

	--[[User:IMAGinES\|IMAGinES]] 01:03, 21 Jun 2005 (PDT)		--[[User:IMAGinES\|IMAGinES]] 01:03, 21 Jun 2005 (PDT)

			I'd imagine there is a limit of sorts, though. After all, I doubt Programs could be "Upgraded" after becoming sentient, and eventually, they might grow...so to say...too old for the systems. For instance, hypothetically, using our timeline, let's say Sentient Programs have been around since...Windows 98. We'll use 1998 as a base point, since it's when a lot of the base technologies got "established"(The Internet as we know it, Operating Systems, GUIs, etc). If we use the begining of 1998 to the begining of 2005, that's 3,679,200 Program Days, or just over 10,000 Years. And we've had huge leaps in technology in only 7 years(Processors going from being measured in Megahertz to Gigahertz, RAM going from 16 and 32 meg sticks to being able to find it in entire Gigabyte sticks, Video Cards now needing RAM of their own, and often times as much or more then the system itself, etc), imagine what Wakers, that survive, must think. Even being as gradual as it's been, you can't tell me it hasn't been culture shock of sorts. Having the newer Desktop Machines now as large as the old New York Hub used to be.

			Of course, there's another idea I had, which while unsupported, I think is just plausible enough to possibly work.

			Note: This is just my rambling, feel free to ignore.

			Wakers are the second generation of Progenitor Viruses. When the Viruses Spread, they don't leave intelligence in their wake as much as "bud off". Thus, Wakers are litterally the children of the Progenitors, even if they had to do it by melding with a normal program. Except for a few. Since they were first made, a few, and with increasing frequency, have been becoming Progenitors of sorts, not quite as destructive, but nowhere near benign. They destroy a System...and vanish. Leaving behind a Waker which is similar to the one that "evolved" into the Semi-Progenitor, but starting with a clean slate. Meaning that it's fully possible that a single Waker is a third or fourth generation Waker who's gone through it multiple times, growing and then diminishing back into a Waker.

			--[[User:Igtenio\|Igtenio]]

IMAGinES at 08:03, 21 June 2005

2005-06-21T08:03:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:03, 21 June 2005
Line 7:		Line 7:
	--[[User:IMAGinES\|IMAGinES]] 08:45, 17 Jun 2005 (PDT)		--[[User:IMAGinES\|IMAGinES]] 08:45, 17 Jun 2005 (PDT)

	== Lifespans ==		= Waker Lifespans =

	No real upper limit on a program’s lifespan; a mobile waker could live for centuries of Program Time.		No real upper limit on a program’s lifespan; a mobile waker could live for centuries of Program Time.

IMAGinES: Lifespans

2005-06-21T08:03:41Z

Lifespans

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:03, 21 June 2005
Line 6:		Line 6:

	--[[User:IMAGinES\|IMAGinES]] 08:45, 17 Jun 2005 (PDT)		--[[User:IMAGinES\|IMAGinES]] 08:45, 17 Jun 2005 (PDT)

			== Lifespans ==

			No real upper limit on a program’s lifespan; a mobile waker could live for centuries of Program Time.

			No time passes for programs on a shut down computer. Not dead; effectively deep hibernation.

			--[[User:IMAGinES\|IMAGinES]] 01:03, 21 Jun 2005 (PDT)

IMAGinES: /* Language and Labelling */

2005-06-17T15:46:09Z

Language and Labelling

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:46, 17 June 2005
Line 3:		Line 3:
	As mentioned on the [[Talk:HorizonVirtual:Places\|Places discussion]] page, the text makes clear in several places that, barring programmers, wakers have no grasp of a written language and cannot read. However, it then goes on to mention how data access poarts in major systems are "clearly marked" with destination information, and that maps exist. The question is, if DAPs are labelled and wakers have no understanding of (presumably) symbolic langauge, how are they even capable of understanding what said labels mean?		As mentioned on the [[Talk:HorizonVirtual:Places\|Places discussion]] page, the text makes clear in several places that, barring programmers, wakers have no grasp of a written language and cannot read. However, it then goes on to mention how data access poarts in major systems are "clearly marked" with destination information, and that maps exist. The question is, if DAPs are labelled and wakers have no understanding of (presumably) symbolic langauge, how are they even capable of understanding what said labels mean?

	My personal theory is that, while DAPs are not labelled with actual names or descriptions, they are labelled with the IP address of their destination. I think that, while wakers may not be able to ~~rea~~ a written language, they have no problem with numbers, and would be able to read an IP address and think, "Ah; that's the IP address for New York Hub!"		My personal theory is that, while DAPs are not labelled with actual names or descriptions, they are labelled with the IP address of their destination. I think that, while wakers may not be able to read a written language, they have no problem with numbers, and would be able to read an IP address and think, "Ah; that's the IP address for New York Hub!"

	--[[User:IMAGinES\|IMAGinES]] 08:45, 17 Jun 2005 (PDT)		--[[User:IMAGinES\|IMAGinES]] 08:45, 17 Jun 2005 (PDT)

IMAGinES at 15:45, 17 June 2005

2005-06-17T15:45:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:45, 17 June 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	= Language and Labelling =		= Language and Labelling =

	As mentioned on the [[HorizonVirtual:Places\|Places]] page, the text makes clear in several places that, barring programmers, wakers have no grasp of a written language and cannot read. However, it then goes on to mention how data access poarts in major systems are "clearly marked" with destination information, and that maps exist. The question is, if DAPs are labelled and wakers have no understanding of (presumably) symbolic langauge, how are they even capable of understanding what said labels mean?		As mentioned on the [[Talk:HorizonVirtual:Places\|Places discussion]] page, the text makes clear in several places that, barring programmers, wakers have no grasp of a written language and cannot read. However, it then goes on to mention how data access poarts in major systems are "clearly marked" with destination information, and that maps exist. The question is, if DAPs are labelled and wakers have no understanding of (presumably) symbolic langauge, how are they even capable of understanding what said labels mean?

	My personal theory is that, while DAPs are not labelled with actual names or descriptions, they are labelled with the IP address of their destination. I think that, while wakers may not be able to rea a written language, they have no problem with numbers, and would be able to read an IP address and think, "Ah; that's the IP address for New York Hub!"		My personal theory is that, while DAPs are not labelled with actual names or descriptions, they are labelled with the IP address of their destination. I think that, while wakers may not be able to rea a written language, they have no problem with numbers, and would be able to read an IP address and think, "Ah; that's the IP address for New York Hub!"

	--[[User:IMAGinES\|IMAGinES]] 08:31, 17 Jun 2005 (PDT)		--[[User:IMAGinES\|IMAGinES]] 08:45, 17 Jun 2005 (PDT)

IMAGinES at 15:45, 17 June 2005

2005-06-17T15:45:25Z

New page

= Language and Labelling =

As mentioned on the [[HorizonVirtual:Places|Places]] page, the text makes clear in several places that, barring programmers, wakers have no grasp of a written language and cannot read. However, it then goes on to mention how data access poarts in major systems are "clearly marked" with destination information, and that maps exist. The question is, if DAPs are labelled and wakers have no understanding of (presumably) symbolic langauge, how are they even capable of understanding what said labels mean?

My personal theory is that, while DAPs are not labelled with actual names or descriptions, they are labelled with the IP address of their destination. I think that, while wakers may not be able to rea a written language, they have no problem with numbers, and would be able to read an IP address and think, "Ah; that's the IP address for New York Hub!"

--[[User:IMAGinES|IMAGinES]] 08:31, 17 Jun 2005 (PDT)