GnomeWorks at 00:36, 17 October 2007

2007-10-17T00:36:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:36, 17 October 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~[[category:Trinity]]~~

	The defender class is not an original concept. The basic idea was taken from the armiger class presented in ''Iron Heroes''; however, I felt that adding the class as it was to Trinity was not appropriate, and ad hoc shoehorned it into the system without writing down anything I had done to do so.		The defender class is not an original concept. The basic idea was taken from the armiger class presented in ''Iron Heroes''; however, I felt that adding the class as it was to Trinity was not appropriate, and ad hoc shoehorned it into the system without writing down anything I had done to do so.

Line 9:		Line 7:
	=Defender=		=Defender=
	Coming soon.		Coming soon.

			[[category:Trinity]]

GnomeWorks at 03:34, 24 December 2006

2006-12-24T03:34:36Z

New page

[[category:Trinity]]

The defender class is not an original concept. The basic idea was taken from the armiger class presented in ''Iron Heroes''; however, I felt that adding the class as it was to Trinity was not appropriate, and ad hoc shoehorned it into the system without writing down anything I had done to do so.

Since, I have found a [http://www.zipworld.com.au/~hong/ih/armiger.htm modification] of the class, which I find appropriate. However, the usage of the armor tokens in that example proved difficult - ergo, I borrowed the rules found [http://ironheroeshouserules.pbwiki.com/ here] (specifically Harry Pratt's armiger modifications), which made armor tokens much more manageable.

Having solved the vast majority of the problems in converting the armiger from IH to regular d20, I then added my own modifications to the class, resulting in what follows.

=Defender=
Coming soon.

Trinity:Defender - Revision history

GnomeWorks at 00:36, 17 October 2007

GnomeWorks at 03:34, 24 December 2006