Editing SGA 2003 Archive
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 448: | Line 448: | ||
=Von Goten's Predicament= | =Von Goten's Predicament= | ||
; Game System | ; Game System | ||
| − | : | + | : Burning Wheel |
; Pitch | ; Pitch | ||
: | : | ||
| Line 501: | Line 501: | ||
:Final analysis? BW was not an overwhelming hit, at least for this crowd, although the players did seem to like it okay. David remarked that he enjoyed the "gritty" feel of the world and the system, while Lucas was interested in the skill and attribute development mechanic. I think BW would play best with folks who are looking for some serious simulationism, and are willing to take on the necessary attention to detail and bookkeeping. And, while the one-shot was fun, I think BW needs to be played as a campaign to be truely appreciated. | :Final analysis? BW was not an overwhelming hit, at least for this crowd, although the players did seem to like it okay. David remarked that he enjoyed the "gritty" feel of the world and the system, while Lucas was interested in the skill and attribute development mechanic. I think BW would play best with folks who are looking for some serious simulationism, and are willing to take on the necessary attention to detail and bookkeeping. And, while the one-shot was fun, I think BW needs to be played as a campaign to be truely appreciated. | ||
| + | |||
=Universalis= | =Universalis= | ||
