Difference between revisions of "Talk:Open Game Systems"

From RPGnet
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I removed the following comment from the "Definition" paragraph and replaced it with a note about the fact that many licenses are not compatible:
 
I removed the following comment from the "Definition" paragraph and replaced it with a note about the fact that many licenses are not compatible:
"(There are those who would quibble with the inclusion of Creative Commons here, largely due to issues of possible incompatibility with other free content licenses; this page is not concerned with those issues, but if you are combining content from many different open games, it is worth thinking about.)"
+
 
I think that "quibbling" shouldbetter happen in the Discussion page then at the project page itself. ^_^
+
"(''There are those who would quibble with the inclusion of Creative Commons here, largely due to issues of possible incompatibility with other free content licenses; this page is not concerned with those issues, but if you are combining content from many different open games, it is worth thinking about.'')"
 +
 
 +
I think that "quibbling" should better happen in the Discussion page then at the project page itself. ^_^
 
EDIT: Argh, not logged in, dammit.
 
EDIT: Argh, not logged in, dammit.
 
--[[User:Lord Minx|Lord Minx]] 15:29, 19 October 2007 (PDT)
 
--[[User:Lord Minx|Lord Minx]] 15:29, 19 October 2007 (PDT)

Revision as of 15:30, 19 October 2007

I removed the following comment from the "Definition" paragraph and replaced it with a note about the fact that many licenses are not compatible:

"(There are those who would quibble with the inclusion of Creative Commons here, largely due to issues of possible incompatibility with other free content licenses; this page is not concerned with those issues, but if you are combining content from many different open games, it is worth thinking about.)"

I think that "quibbling" should better happen in the Discussion page then at the project page itself. ^_^ EDIT: Argh, not logged in, dammit. --Lord Minx 15:29, 19 October 2007 (PDT)