Editing Tales of Perpetual Peace/Babbling Stargazer Meng

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 193: Line 193:
  
 
2. '''Battle-Scholar's Insight'''
 
2. '''Battle-Scholar's Insight'''
*You may make an Tactics-based Minor Action on your initiative roll to 'predict' a single opponent's offensive approach for the round. If the Minor Action succeeds, the opponent must act in accord with this quasi-prediction or suffer a -10 penalty to all actions on his attack roll.
+
*You may make an Awareness-based Minor Action on your initiative roll to 'predict' a single opponent's offensive approach for the round. If the Minor Action succeeds, the opponent must act in accord with this quasi-prediction or suffer a -10 penalty to all actions on his attack roll.
 
*The difficulty of this Minor Action is set by the Sage based on the likelihood and the specificity of the prediction. Something the target might do anyway (e.g. target one of his opponents that round over another) is Common [20] difficulty; something that seems tactically dubious but for which you can provide some justification (e.g. 'He forgoes using Dragon Chi this round to demonstrate his superiority!') can be anywhere from Moderate [30] to Legendary [80]; while absurd predictions (e.g. the target attacks his ally, or surrenders at the start of a fight against an evenly matched opponent) are at least Legendary [80], if not Impossible [100].
 
*The difficulty of this Minor Action is set by the Sage based on the likelihood and the specificity of the prediction. Something the target might do anyway (e.g. target one of his opponents that round over another) is Common [20] difficulty; something that seems tactically dubious but for which you can provide some justification (e.g. 'He forgoes using Dragon Chi this round to demonstrate his superiority!') can be anywhere from Moderate [30] to Legendary [80]; while absurd predictions (e.g. the target attacks his ally, or surrenders at the start of a fight against an evenly matched opponent) are at least Legendary [80], if not Impossible [100].
 +
  
 
==Loresheets==
 
==Loresheets==

Please note that all contributions to RPGnet may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see RPGnet:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)