Editing Collations

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 35: Line 35:
 
Who was Clockwork? For that matter, who were the others Sir John had mentioned, Drum and Zig Zag and Fanny?  Clockwork was known to my father.  Did that mean Clockwork was also known to me, albeit unwitting?  How could I verify it? Who could I ask? And who were Drum and Zig Zag and Fanny?  Did my father know them too? <br><br>
 
Who was Clockwork? For that matter, who were the others Sir John had mentioned, Drum and Zig Zag and Fanny?  Clockwork was known to my father.  Did that mean Clockwork was also known to me, albeit unwitting?  How could I verify it? Who could I ask? And who were Drum and Zig Zag and Fanny?  Did my father know them too? <br><br>
  
''One step at a time.  Go back to what you know.  Sir John mentioned Germany, Bohemia, and Hungary.  If Rembecki is working for Bismark or Catherine the Great, she would have to pass through those places.  Start there''.<br><br>
+
''One step at a time.  Go back to what you know.  Sir John mentioned Germany, Bohemia, and Hungary.  If Rembecki is working for the Bismark or Catherine the Great, she would have to pass through those places.  Start there''.<br><br>
  
 
Sir John had also mentioned Beignet in our interview and at the time, he had specifically asked if I’d taken anything that had been in Rembecki’s possession.  I’d offered up the napkin without thinking and was warned against touching the napkin more than I had to and to give it to Beignet.  The combination of the personal item of Rembecki’s and the admonition to touch it as little as possible suggested that perhaps magic was to be brought to bear on it.  What little I knew of magic would fill a thimble, but as the popular serials would have one to believe, sympathetic magic involving the napkin, a length of weighted string, and a map might be sufficient to scry Rembecki’s location.<br><br>
 
Sir John had also mentioned Beignet in our interview and at the time, he had specifically asked if I’d taken anything that had been in Rembecki’s possession.  I’d offered up the napkin without thinking and was warned against touching the napkin more than I had to and to give it to Beignet.  The combination of the personal item of Rembecki’s and the admonition to touch it as little as possible suggested that perhaps magic was to be brought to bear on it.  What little I knew of magic would fill a thimble, but as the popular serials would have one to believe, sympathetic magic involving the napkin, a length of weighted string, and a map might be sufficient to scry Rembecki’s location.<br><br>

Please note that all contributions to RPGnet may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see RPGnet:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)