Editing Dynasty & Decadence/House Rules

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 3: Line 3:
 
[[Category:Exalted]]
 
[[Category:Exalted]]
  
 +
#) Collated and final Stats, with huge apologies for jerking people around -
 +
** 19 Attribute Points to spend as you like
 +
** 48 Ability Points (20 from Aspect or Favoured; Dynastic minimums apply)
 +
** 25 Charms (loose 1 charm for every 4 CMA charms)
 +
** 18 Background Points (updated backgrounds below, no family background).
 +
** 7 Virtues, 3 Essence.
 +
** 45 Bonus Points.
  
1) Collated and final Stats, with huge apologies for jerking people around -
+
#) The Host’s Hierarch of Nobility, determining the lowness of bows, honourifics and general matters of prestige and obedience are complex. Compared with, say, English feudalism, the Realm uses this system to finely nuance it’s hierarchy instead of using levelled titles and ranks like Duke, Count, Prince, Lord, Knight. Every citizen of the Realm who can pass a difficulty 2 Socialize or better can do the mental calculations to determine where people fit on this scale and how to act in their presence.
* 19 Attribute Points to spend as you like
+
For guidelines, I’ve made a system using a scoring method:
* 48 Ability Points (20 from Aspect or Favoured; Dynastic minimums apply)
 
* 25 Charms (loose 1 charm for every 4 CMA charms)
 
* 18 Background Points (updated backgrounds below, no family background).
 
* 7 Virtues, 3 Essence.
 
* 45 Bonus Points.
 
 
 
 
 
2) The Host’s Hierarch of Nobility, determining the lowness of bows, honourifics and general matters of prestige and obedience are complex. Compared with, say, English feudalism, the Realm uses this system to finely nuance it’s hierarchy instead of using levelled titles and ranks like Duke, Count, Prince, Lord, Knight. Every citizen of the Realm who can pass a difficulty 2 Socialize or better can do the mental calculations to determine where people fit on this scale and how to act in their presence. For guidelines, I’ve made a system using a scoring method:
 
  
 
*Backgrounds: Reputation, Backing, Breeding, dignified Connections, Resources and Command all gain points.
 
*Backgrounds: Reputation, Backing, Breeding, dignified Connections, Resources and Command all gain points.
Line 24: Line 23:
  
  
 +
#) Imperial Resources: I’ve realised I am generally unhappy with the scale of the Resources Background for use in DB games. It seems to me to work much better for Solars or Infernals, abstracting the range of wealth for all Creation. For Dynasts, the fluff never speaks of having difficulty buying a meal or even living in a bedsit worrying over the price of a sword. And with only 10,000 Dynasts divvying the loot of the Realm, who is picking up less than a shekel a year? The range is clearly intended to be narrower and differently focused, and I’d rather be able to finely delineate, especially if you go off the 2nd Edition book. And ‘12 or more talents’ is usually fine for Resources 5, but when your buying and selling manses, nations and favour, the difference between 12 talents and 30 talents is notable. Ultimately, money is also a soft power for Dynasts as well as hard – “The richest in all Lord’s Crossing, I say. 10,000 a year, all up!”
  
3) Imperial Resources: I’ve realised I am generally unhappy with the scale of the Resources Background for use in DB games. It seems to me to work much better for Solars or Infernals, abstracting the range of wealth for all Creation. For Dynasts, the fluff never speaks of having difficulty buying a meal or even living in a bedsit worrying over the price of a sword. And with only 10,000 Dynasts divvying the loot of the Realm, who is picking up less than a shekel a year? The range is clearly intended to be narrower and differently focused, and I’d rather be able to finely delineate, especially if you go off the 2nd Edition book. And ‘12 or more talents’ is usually fine for Resources 5, but when your buying and selling manses, nations and favour, the difference between 12 talents and 30 talents is notable. Ultimately, money is also a soft power for Dynasts as well as hard – “The richest in all Lord’s Crossing, I say. 10,000 a year, all up!”
+
The descriptions below should give a rough feel and I’ve included median annual incomes for each level.
 
 
The descriptions below should give a rough feel and I’ve included median annual incomes for each level:
 
  
 
*X Resource: Anything between disgraceful bankruptcy, itinerant monkhood and strange principled poverty.
 
*X Resource: Anything between disgraceful bankruptcy, itinerant monkhood and strange principled poverty.
Line 36: Line 34:
 
*••••• Resource: 45 talents. A financial pillar of Creation, an Exalted Rothschilde or Crosseus. Donating a new wing for Great House’s Imperial Manse or sponsoring a dozen studio of godblooded artificers is a minor investment. Building a new city in your favourite Satrapy is a medium-term project.
 
*••••• Resource: 45 talents. A financial pillar of Creation, an Exalted Rothschilde or Crosseus. Donating a new wing for Great House’s Imperial Manse or sponsoring a dozen studio of godblooded artificers is a minor investment. Building a new city in your favourite Satrapy is a medium-term project.
  
 +
#) Retainers and Resources always seemed a silly fine line – who has 20 talents of jade but doesn’t have whatever servants and slaves they want? Where does the social context arise for someone to makes less than a peasant but have 20-something loyal retainers?
  
 +
The idea of the background seems to give a sense of Imperial grandeur and establish your relation with the world. So lets keep that, but change to a more Roman client / Japanese feudality sort of effect. This system already seems to be in place by the books, but it is currently only represented by a vague use of Influence. So this also makes up for the lack of the grandeur of Followers for anyone who wants to rule men in a non-military way,
  
4) Retainers and Resources always seemed a silly fine line – who has 20 talents of jade but doesn’t have whatever servants and slaves they want? Where does the social context arise for someone to makes less than a peasant but have 20-something loyal retainers? The idea of the background seems to give a sense of Imperial grandeur and establish your relation with the world. So lets keep that, but change to a more Roman client / Japanese feudality sort of effect. This system already seems to be in place by the books, but it is currently only represented by a vague use of Influence. So this also makes up for the lack of the grandeur of Followers for anyone who wants to rule men in a non-military way. So, a retainer is an unExalted Dynast, citizen or patrician client of the Realm who owes you their service, allegiance and obedience, and who you owe protection and favouritism. It is informal rather than feudal, but is recognised by law. The Retainer Background covers many members of Realm society are your retainers. It counts how many free citizens of the Realm have sworn on as your retainer, including both free servants (who are retainers who stay with you and perform tasks for you), civilians and patricians. In short, it describes your degree of ‘lordliness’, your impact on townships, civilians, peasants and Realm society.
+
So, a retainer is an unExalted Dynast, citizen or patrician client of the Realm who owes you their service, allegiance and obedience, and who you owe protection and favouritism. It is informal rather than feudal, but is recognised by law. The Retainer Background covers many members of Realm society are your retainers. It counts how many free citizens of the Realm have sworn on as your retainer, including both free servants (who are retainers who stay with you and perform tasks for you), civilians and patricians. In short, it describes your degree of ‘lordliness’, your impact on townships, civilians, peasants and Realm society.
  
 
*X Retainers: You are outside of the client system. No Imperial obligations flow up to you. This is pretty common for Dynasts who spend their lives overseas.
 
*X Retainers: You are outside of the client system. No Imperial obligations flow up to you. This is pretty common for Dynasts who spend their lives overseas.
Line 47: Line 47:
 
*••••• Retainers: Thousands of citizens call you ‘dominus’. You can request favours from almost all trained professions, and have clients in multiple prefectures. A dozen respected patrician families walk in your shadow, incorporating your colours in their House livery. Among these, twenty to fifty retainers are in your direct service at all times, including at least a couple of unExalted dynasts. Often these are second sons and daughters of the families most loyal to you.
 
*••••• Retainers: Thousands of citizens call you ‘dominus’. You can request favours from almost all trained professions, and have clients in multiple prefectures. A dozen respected patrician families walk in your shadow, incorporating your colours in their House livery. Among these, twenty to fifty retainers are in your direct service at all times, including at least a couple of unExalted dynasts. Often these are second sons and daughters of the families most loyal to you.
  
 
+
#) And to make a full run at it, lets go for Craft as well. I have how hard it is to make a Dynastic da Vinci! So here is an ad-hoc hodegepodge for this game. Craft is now technically one single Ability. The first dot in Craft you take is assigned to a discipline (Air, Earth, Fire, Water, Wood). As you raise the skill, that dot goes up to the new level and you gain a new discipline at the next rung down. i.e Craft 5 (Air 5, Earth 4, Wood 3, Fire 2, Water 1) or Craft 3 (Earth 3, Wood 2, Water 1). For lower tier crafts, specialties can be purchased in the disciplines to raise them to equal your highest discipline, and the usual cap of 3 specialties does not apply for this purpose.
 
 
5) And to make a full run at it, lets go for Craft as well. I have how hard it is to make a Dynastic da Vinci! So here is an ad-hoc hodegepodge for this game. Craft is now technically one single Ability. The first dot in Craft you take is assigned to a discipline (Air, Earth, Fire, Water, Wood). As you raise the skill, that dot goes up to the new level and you gain a new discipline at the next rung down. i.e Craft 5 (Air 5, Earth 4, Wood 3, Fire 2, Water 1) or Craft 3 (Earth 3, Wood 2, Water 1). For lower tier crafts, specialties can be purchased in the disciplines to raise them to equal your highest discipline, and the usual cap of 3 specialties does not apply for this purpose.
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
==Questions==
 
==Questions==

Please note that all contributions to RPGnet may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see RPGnet:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)