Editing Talk:Scratch

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
==Toughness is Overpowered==
+
==movement abilities should be more useful when escaping==
As the Scratch system has evolved, hit points have gradually increased relative to the damage of attack abilities, so everybody wants to be a tank because hit points guarantee you will last longer.
 
  
Currently our official average hit points are about right (3 for an unarmored average person, 4 or 5 for a "squishy" PC, 6 or more for a tank) and the power of our attack abilities is about right (some people say they are too powerful, some say they have been nerfed, so that suggests we have hit the sweet spot.)
+
Movement abilities are not as useful as they should be when escaping.
 +
Only hold and getting incapacitated can prevent you from escaping.
 +
The movement ability bonus to agility does not help you avoid holds, and you lose the bonus once you are held. Ideas for making movement abilities more useful while escaping:
  
So how do we tweak the incentives so that squishy characters will be happy with 4 or 5 hit points, but tanks will still want to have lots of hit points?
+
*add movement abilities to strength when you evade
 +
**This is my favorite of these options.--[[User:BFGalbraith|BFGalbraith]] 01:09, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 +
**What if it also added to your intelligence while evading?--[[User:BFGalbraith|BFGalbraith]] 01:09, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 +
***it would make it harder to delay you with a distract action while evading
 +
****evading the distraction makes narrative sense
 +
****this helps you escape because delaying prevents escape
 +
***it would make it harder to panic you with a surprise or delay action while evading
 +
****does not help you escape - panicked characters can still evade and escape.
 +
****keeps you from having to evade again or escape next turn
 +
****does evading a surprise make narrative sense?
 +
****does evading intimidation make narrative sense?
 +
*hold against an evading character has to roll higher than both agility and strength
 +
*hold always has to roll higher than both agility and strength
  
We already have the engage action, which helps tanks absorb damage by drawing aggro. In playtesting, healers are more likely to be targeted by holds than high-damage attacks, so wrestling (to increase strength) might actually be better for healers than lots of toughness. Healers and long-range attackers can also take cover.
+
==describing actions that can only be used once per encounter==
  
====Bug to Feature====
+
Should we define "unrepeatable" actions as actions that can only be used once per encounter, or should we just say that the action can only be used once per encounter in each case?
  
Context could play a big part here, because this problem is likely to be fixed by the skill system intended for Squawk 2nd EdTDW might be the last game in the foreseeable future that uses Scratch without skills. ''In TDW, there is a really good narrative to why PCs should gain toughness more often than other abilities'', which the following text could be added to TDW to explain:
+
:IMHO unrepeatable is English enough that we should define it and then use it, because the word matches so closely their most likely guess is the definitionMeanwhile the category of unrepeatable makes the system over-all easier to understand.--[[User:BFGalbraith|BFGalbraith]] 17:51, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
:Essence often warps Sorcerers into more powerful forms, increasing their size, natural armor, or other physical alterations that make them more physically resilient.  Therefore, it is appropriate for Sorcerers to use essence to gain Toughness more often than other abilities.
 
If we go with this option, this Toughness balance issue can be tabled until we are using skills in Scratch.
 
  
====Real Solution====
+
==holding the person who is holding you==
  
What if we had a rule for all injured or incapacitated characters (including minions) that between encounters they only heal to barely-healthy, unless they can make a detection, craftsmanship or healing roll to regenerate themselves to full HP?
+
The big risk of getting someone in a hold in real-life is that they can also grab you, immobilizing you as well, even if they have an inferior hold. So you should be able to hold someone who is holding you. Should you be able to do this whenever you are delayed or only when you are delayed by a hold?
  
:This would decrease the guarantee that hit points make you last longer, which would be good.
+
==taking cover while reloading==
  
:Can you use your roll to heal an ally instead of yourself?
+
It makes sense for someone to be using the same cover they had before, even if their projectile weapon has a lot of kick or takes a while to reload. So should you be able to take cover when you are delayed by your own shooting or blasting attack, or should you only be able to STAY in cover when you are delayed by your own shooting or blasting attack?
  
::"Yes" makes more narrative sense IMHO. --[[User:BFGalbraith|BFGalbraith]] 10:17, 25 June 2011 (PDT)
+
==grid movement when you are delayed by your own moves==
  
:This should be the rule for a "normal" encounter cycle. Depending on the game this could mean a short rest, a month or a year of rehabilitation. Within each game there may be some back-to-back encounters without the opportunity to heal, and there may be longer breaks or full healing services at some points in a long campaign (i.e. "return to town".)
+
*Being delayed by your own knockout, shooting or blasting shouldn't keep you from moving.
 +
*Getting delayed by a hold action should keep you from moving.
 +
*Should being delayed by a distract action keep you from moving?
 +
*Should we distinguish delayed vs. delayed + immobilized with technical terms?
  
:The normal encounter cycle should also be the cycle for changing craftsmanship bonuses.
+
==balance between abilities==
  
:You should not be able to respec minions in the normal encounter cycle. You need a longer break ("return to town") to replace, modify or retrain your minions.
+
Here's how I estimate the approximate value of each ability at each level. This scale is adjusted so that 1 level of an attack ability is worth 1. It's not exactly the same as the CP scale.
 +
 
 +
{|style="text-align:center;"
 +
!ability!!1!!2!!3!!4!!5!!6!!7!!8!!9!!10!!explanation
 +
|-
 +
|toughness||-15||-5||0||3||5||7||9||11||12||13
 +
|style="text-align:left;"|
 +
*none of the other abilities are useful when you are incapacitated
 +
*attack abilities are less useful when you are injured
 +
*Toughness is especially valuable at low levels when you have a high risk of getting injured or incapacitated by each attack.
 +
|-
 +
|attack&nbsp;abilities,<br>craftsmanship,<br>healing ||1||2||3||4||5||6||7||8||9||10
 +
|style="text-align:left;"|
 +
*+5 for your first attack ability because it doubles attack power when healthy
 +
*+1 for craftsmanship versatility?
 +
*+5 for healing (potentially heals several points of damage.)
 +
|-
 +
|stalking abilities||1||2||3||4||5||6||7||8||9||10
 +
|style="text-align:left;"|
 +
*+1 for your first stalking ability (surprise action)
 +
*Stealth and detection give you an up-front initiative bonus.
 +
*The huge detection bonus to initiative makes up for the difference between the value of agility and intelligence.
 +
|-
 +
|movement abilities||&frac34;||1&frac12;||2&frac14;||3||3&frac34;||4&frac12;||5&frac14;||6||6&frac34;||7&frac12;
 +
|style="text-align:left;"|
 +
*+5 for flying because non-flying characters can't hit you with close range attacks when you evade or use a long range attack
 +
*+&frac12; for swimming because non-swimmers and long-range attacks can't hit you when you use swimming to evade
 +
*swimming gives you strength instead of agility, but both attack and agility in water
 +
|-
 +
|command||2||4||6||8||10||12||14||16||18||20
 +
|style="text-align:left;"|
 +
*If you have 2 minions, you can do 3 actions per turn
 +
*You can cause up to 12 damage in a single turn (knockout)
 +
*You can cause up to 9 damage every turn (blasting)
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
===how overpowered is command?===
 +
 
 +
At level 10 you can have two 5 CP minions with 1 attack ability level and 4 toughness. These are probably the optimum attack-oriented minions, or close to it. They have above-average, normal-for-PCs toughness. They let you attack three times as often, tripling your success rate.
 +
 
 +
The command ability values above assume the value of being able to attack twice as often is 10 and the value of being able to attack three times as often is 20. This is probably an over-estimation of the value of command ability. Command ability minions cannot be healed, and they can be injured more easily than a powerful PC (the sort that would have 10 command ability.) Attack abilities double the damage you can do when healthy and this only gives them a value bonus of 5.
 +
 
 +
===are movement abilities powerful enough?===
 +
 
 +
*I have valued movement abilities at &frac34; of the value of attack ability levels
 +
**agility does not protect you against all attacks
 +
**evade is only used in tight spots
 +
**movement ability holds do not cause damage like wrestling
 +
 
 +
But movement abilities are the ONLY way to get agility. --[[User:BFGalbraith|BFGalbraith]] 17:53, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
:You also get agility from stealth.
 +
:*The value of each stealth level is agility + surprise + 2 &times; initiative.
 +
:*The value of a movement level is agility + frequency of terrain type &times; (hold + evade)
 +
:--[[User:SerpLord|SerpLord]] 20:11, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
Does the fact that only movement abilities and stealth give you agility make any difference? --[[User:BFGalbraith|BFGalbraith]] 17:53, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
:Agility is a very important defense that you can only increase with those abilities, but you can use an attack ability and benefit from it's advantages every single time you attack. You cannot choose whether your enemies use normal, force or psychic attacks. --[[User:SerpLord|SerpLord]] 20:11, 31 May 2011 (UTC)--
 +
 
 +
What if movement abilities are the only ability bonus for distract? --[[User:BFGalbraith|BFGalbraith]] 17:53, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
:Then the value of a movement level would be agility + frequency of terrain type &times; (distract + hold + evade) which might be closer to 1 than &frac34;. --[[User:SerpLord|SerpLord]] 20:11, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
Can we make generalizations about the frequency of terrain types? Here's a quick guess about what a typical fantasy game would feature:
 +
 
 +
*90% of maps will have flat terrain suitable for quickness
 +
*70% of maps will have clearance for flying
 +
*50% of maps will have rough terrain for acrobatics
 +
*20% of maps will have water for swimming
 +
 
 +
[[The Dark Woods]] fits this guess except in the case of quickness:
 +
 
 +
*5/9 areas have quickness movement
 +
*6/9 areas have flying movement
 +
*5/9 areas have acrobatics movement
 +
*2/9 areas have swimming movement
 +
 
 +
These generalizations suggest to me that terrain-specific advantages can be used most of the time with quickness or flying. A little bit less often with acrobatics, and only rarely with swimming. If we allow movement abilities to be used for the distract action, would this be limited to the appropriate terrain type?  If so, then it would significantly increase the value of each level of movement ability ''except for swimming.'' --[[User:SerpLord|SerpLord]] 20:11, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
==distraction abilities==
 +
 
 +
You should be able to add ANY ability level except for toughness to a distract roll (close range delay attack vs. intelligence)
 +
 
 +
Pro:
 +
 
 +
*distract does not currently have an ability bonus
 +
*toughness is by far the most useful ability
 +
*players can have fun inventing their own tricks for distracting enemies
 +
 
 +
Con:
 +
 
 +
*vague narrative
 +
*a player can throw a random ability at an enemy, leaving other players scratching their heads about what happened.
 +
 
 +
This is a sort of "attack by role-playing."
 +
 
 +
:Some abilities seem more suited to distract than others: acrobatics, detection, stealth, command seem much more appropriate than craftsmanship and healing.  In between are the combat abilities and other movement abilities. --[[User:BFGalbraith|BFGalbraith]] 04:54, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
::Movement abilities seem like they would be useful for distracting in environments where they can be used to evade. If these were the ONLY abilities that could be used for distraction, this would help balance the abilities (downside: stealth could not be used for distraction) --[[User:SerpLord|SerpLord]] 14:32, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
::: I like the idea of only using movement abilities for distraction.  While it does not explain why some abilitiy's can NOT be used for distraction, it does not do a greater evil, which is to have an explaination-defying selection of abilities do distraction.  IMHO this is our best choice so far for haviing ability bonuses apply to distraction. --[[User:BFGalbraith|BFGalbraith]] 04:15, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
  
 
==more realistic healing options==
 
==more realistic healing options==
 +
:I am wondering about a simplified healing rule for TDW that works like this:
 +
*Each character can only be healed once per encounter (so that "recieve healing" or "regenerate" is more or less an unrepeatable action.)
 +
*When a character is successfully healed, he goes to his stamina +1 (barely healthy) state, regardless of weather he was only injured or incapacitated before.
 +
**A possible variation on this is that incapacitated characters simply can't be healed inside of one encounter.  But in TDW, healing the incapacitated is fine. --[[User:BFGalbraith|BFGalbraith]] 18:04, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
  
Note: the three main scratch projects right now (TDW, HoW, Squawk 2nd Ed.) are fantasy/sci-fi with lots of explanations for "unrealistic healing."  IMHO this rule may be decided on in the not-near future.--[[User:BFGalbraith|BFGalbraith]] 14:31, 20 June 2011 (PDT)
 
  
 
games without healing ability (dinosaurs and prehistoric animals)
 
games without healing ability (dinosaurs and prehistoric animals)
Line 66: Line 184:
 
==optional death rules==
 
==optional death rules==
  
realistic or brutal games like [[Resilience]] might have death rules that add dramatic tension and character expendability.
+
realistic or brutal games like Resilience might have death rules that add dramatic tension and character expendability.

Please note that all contributions to RPGnet may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see RPGnet:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)