Editing Talk:Scratch

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
==Toughness is Overpowered==
+
== simplified healing ==
As the Scratch system has evolved, hit points have gradually increased relative to the damage of attack abilities, so everybody wants to be a tank because hit points guarantee you will last longer.
+
What if we simplified the healing rule so that characters can only be healed once per encounter, but healing always restored the character to healthy (stamina +1)? (I realize that there currently is no limit on healing, but a more complex healing limit than what I have proposed here is may soon be incoming.)--[[User:BFGalbraith|BFGalbraith]] 18:04, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
  
Currently our official average hit points are about right (3 for an unarmored average person, 4 or 5 for a "squishy" PC, 6 or more for a tank) and the power of our attack abilities is about right (some people say they are too powerful, some say they have been nerfed, so that suggests we have hit the sweet spot.)
+
==taking cover while reloading==
  
So how do we tweak the incentives so that squishy characters will be happy with 4 or 5 hit points, but tanks will still want to have lots of hit points?
+
The bonus and penalty from take cover should last as long as you want, but while you are in cover, you cannot do a close range attack, evade, intimidate or surprise.
  
We already have the engage action, which helps tanks absorb damage by drawing aggro. In playtesting, healers are more likely to be targeted by holds than high-damage attacks, so wrestling (to increase strength) might actually be better for healers than lots of toughness. Healers and long-range attackers can also take cover.
+
You can use healing ability, do long range attacks (with the -2 penalty) or choose to do nothing while you take cover.
  
====Bug to Feature====
+
:There is no penalty for using healing ability when you take cover, so it is always better to take cover when you use healing. Does it even make sense to take cover when you are healing an ally?
  
Context could play a big part here, because this problem is likely to be fixed by the skill system intended for Squawk 2nd Ed.  TDW might be the last game in the foreseeable future that uses Scratch without skills.  ''In TDW, there is a really good narrative to why PCs should gain toughness more often than other abilities'', which the following text could be added to TDW to explain:
+
What if you are held while you are in cover?
:Essence often warps Sorcerers into more powerful forms, increasing their size, natural armor, or other physical alterations that make them more physically resilient.  Therefore, it is appropriate for Sorcerers to use essence to gain Toughness more often than other abilities.
 
If we go with this option, this Toughness balance issue can be tabled until we are using skills in Scratch.
 
  
====Real Solution====
+
What if you are panicked while you are in cover?
  
What if we had a rule for all injured or incapacitated characters (including minions) that between encounters they only heal to barely-healthy, unless they can make a detection, craftsmanship or healing roll to regenerate themselves to full HP?
+
==grid movement when you are delayed by your own moves==
  
:This would decrease the guarantee that hit points make you last longer, which would be good.
+
*Being delayed by your own knockout, shooting or blasting shouldn't keep you from moving.
 +
*Getting delayed by a hold action should keep you from moving.
 +
*Should being delayed by a distract action keep you from moving?
 +
*Should we use "immobilized" as a technical term to mean you cannot move grid spaces?
  
:Can you use your roll to heal an ally instead of yourself?
+
==balance between abilities==
  
::"Yes" makes more narrative sense IMHO. --[[User:BFGalbraith|BFGalbraith]] 10:17, 25 June 2011 (PDT)
+
Most of our ability levels are well-balanced. Increasing stalking ability, movement ability, craftsmanship or healing from level 1 to level 2 is worth about the same increasing an attack ability from level 1 to level 2. (Swimming levels might be a little underpowered.)
  
:This should be the rule for a "normal" encounter cycle. Depending on the game this could mean a short rest, a month or a year of rehabilitation. Within each game there may be some back-to-back encounters without the opportunity to heal, and there may be longer breaks or full healing services at some points in a long campaign (i.e. "return to town".)
+
===command levels are too valuable===
  
:The normal encounter cycle should also be the cycle for changing craftsmanship bonuses.
+
Command ability is worth about 3 times as much as other abilities against enemies with 11 defense, about twice as much as other abilities against enemies with 16 defense, and about the same as other abilities against enemies with 20 defense.
  
:You should not be able to respec minions in the normal encounter cycle. You need a longer break ("return to town") to replace, modify or retrain your minions.
+
:We could reign in command by thinking beyond the individual encounter. Perhaps healing and replacing command ability minions is more difficult than healing and replacing PCs between encounters. --[[User:SerpLord|SerpLord]] 22:55, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
::What if minions CAN be healed, but only between battles, and only with successful healing rolls? --[[User:BFGalbraith|BFGalbraith]] 22:16, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
:::That would make command ability depend on healing ability, and it's not consistent with the idea that you might recruit minions or create them with something other than healing ability. --[[User:SerpLord|SerpLord]] 04:37, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
===toughness is too valuable at medium levels===
 +
 
 +
Characters with 1 level of attack ability have a strong incentive to increase their toughness up to level 7, 8 or 9 before they develop any other abilities. This means that instead of a more or less even distribution of a characters with 5 to 10 toughness at the end of the game, optimizing players will ALL have 9 toughness at the end of the game, and very low levels of other abilities that don't pay off as much per level.
 +
 
 +
:We could reign in toughness by thinking beyond the individual encounter. For example suppose sorcerers in TDW automatically heal up to stamina + 1 between encounters. Then they can make a detection, craftsmanship or healing roll to regenerate themselves to full HP. (Note: toughness was not in that list.) If we want to be even more brutal, we can have the difficulty depend on your toughness, stamina or the amount of damage you have taken. --[[User:SerpLord|SerpLord]] 22:55, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
===level 1 abilities have very different values===
 +
 
 +
Having at least 1 level of certain abilities adds extra value.
 +
 
 +
*(~5 levels) your first attack ability doubles attack power when healthy
 +
*(~5 levels) healing potentially heals several points of damage
 +
*(~5 levels) non-flying characters can't hit flying characters with close range attacks when they evade or use a long range attack
 +
*(~1 level) craftsmanship versatility
 +
*(~1 level) your first stalking ability (surprise action)
 +
*(~½ level) command ability intimidate action
 +
*(~½ level) non-swimmers and long-range attacks can't hit character who use swimming to evade
 +
*(0 levels) other movement aiblities
  
 
==more realistic healing options==
 
==more realistic healing options==
 
Note: the three main scratch projects right now (TDW, HoW, Squawk 2nd Ed.) are fantasy/sci-fi with lots of explanations for "unrealistic healing."  IMHO this rule may be decided on in the not-near future.--[[User:BFGalbraith|BFGalbraith]] 14:31, 20 June 2011 (PDT)
 
  
 
games without healing ability (dinosaurs and prehistoric animals)
 
games without healing ability (dinosaurs and prehistoric animals)

Please note that all contributions to RPGnet may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see RPGnet:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)