Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | ==Comments==
| + | Shield of the Battle Maiden should be (+Essence, to a maximum of 5) to Parry DV, and with no mobility penalty. |
− | * If it is a native style for Loom 2.0 Sidereals, then any Loom 2.0 Sidereal would be able to create custom charms for the style. -[[User:Sunrunner|sunrunner]] 20:17, 9 November 2009 (PST)
| |
− | **Suggested fix: 'This Style is considered native for any Chosen of Battles using charms from Loom 2.0'. -[[User:Andrensath|Andrensath]] 17:50, 10 November 2009 (NZDT)
| |
− | **[[Taurus II]]: Using Loom 2.0 evades the Sidereal prohibition on developing custom charms? Really?
| |
− | ***Per IRC chat, no. But they are explicitly banned from *extending* the style. Also, equivalent styles for the other castes need to be developed. But that's a separate discussion. -[[User:Andrensath|Andrensath]] 19:48, 10 November 2009 (NZDT)
| |
− | * Shield of the Battle Maiden should be (+Essence) to Parry DV, and with no mobility penalty.
| |
− | **That sounds fine to me. -[[User:Andrensath|Andrensath]] 17:50, 10 November 2009 (NZDT)
| |
− | **[[Taurus II]]: Ditto.
| |
− | * Guise of the Judge Form: No botches. Try external penalty of "number" for "number" actions. -[[User:Sunrunner|sunrunner]] 20:17, 9 November 2009 (PST)
| |
− | **Stylist's (MA+Ess)/2 external penalty for Stylist's (MA+Ess)/2 actions, maybe? -[[User:Andrensath|Andrensath]] 17:50, 10 November 2009 (NZDT)
| |
− | **[[Taurus II]]: Can you explain why botches aren't allowed? I figured that, given the limitation that the Stylist has to be participating in the contest, and that she is as vulnerable (mechanics-wise) to the effect as her opponent, it'd be okay.
| |
− | * Panoply of the Maiden of Battles Form: Instead of free weapons, weapons without willpower cost. -[[User:Sunrunner|sunrunner]] 20:17, 9 November 2009 (PST)
| |
− | ** Give Lance/Shield/Sword Reflexive and/or no wp cost? -[[User:Andrensath|Andrensath]] 17:50, 10 November 2009 (NZDT)
| |
− | ***[[Taurus II]]: I like Andrensath's suggestion.
| |
− | ****Which one? Or did you mean using both of them? -[[User:Andrensath|Andrensath]] 19:48, 10 November 2009 (NZDT)
| |
− | *****[[Taurus II]]: Both, yeah.
| |