Difference between revisions of "User talk:Taurus II/Panoply of the Maiden of Battles Style"
Andrensath (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* If it is a native style for Loom 2.0 Sidereals, then any Loom 2.0 Sidereal would be able to create custom charms for the style. -[[User:Sunrunner|sunrunner]] 20:17, 9 November 2009 (PST) | * If it is a native style for Loom 2.0 Sidereals, then any Loom 2.0 Sidereal would be able to create custom charms for the style. -[[User:Sunrunner|sunrunner]] 20:17, 9 November 2009 (PST) | ||
**Suggested fix: 'This Style is considered native for any Chosen of Battles using charms from Loom 2.0'. -[[User:Andrensath|Andrensath]] 17:50, 10 November 2009 (NZDT) | **Suggested fix: 'This Style is considered native for any Chosen of Battles using charms from Loom 2.0'. -[[User:Andrensath|Andrensath]] 17:50, 10 November 2009 (NZDT) | ||
+ | **[[Taurus II]]: Using Loom 2.0 evades the Sidereal prohibition on developing custom charms? Really? | ||
* Shield of the Battle Maiden should be (+Essence) to Parry DV, and with no mobility penalty. | * Shield of the Battle Maiden should be (+Essence) to Parry DV, and with no mobility penalty. | ||
**That sounds fine to me. -[[User:Andrensath|Andrensath]] 17:50, 10 November 2009 (NZDT) | **That sounds fine to me. -[[User:Andrensath|Andrensath]] 17:50, 10 November 2009 (NZDT) | ||
+ | **[[Taurus II]]: Ditto. | ||
* Guise of the Judge Form: No botches. Try external penalty of "number" for "number" actions. -[[User:Sunrunner|sunrunner]] 20:17, 9 November 2009 (PST) | * Guise of the Judge Form: No botches. Try external penalty of "number" for "number" actions. -[[User:Sunrunner|sunrunner]] 20:17, 9 November 2009 (PST) | ||
**Stylist's (MA+Ess)/2 external penalty for Stylist's (MA+Ess)/2 actions, maybe? -[[User:Andrensath|Andrensath]] 17:50, 10 November 2009 (NZDT) | **Stylist's (MA+Ess)/2 external penalty for Stylist's (MA+Ess)/2 actions, maybe? -[[User:Andrensath|Andrensath]] 17:50, 10 November 2009 (NZDT) | ||
+ | **[[Taurus II]]: Can you explain why botches aren't allowed? I figured that, given the limitation that the Stylist has to be participating in the contest, and that she is as vulnerable (mechanics-wise) to the effect as her opponent, it'd be okay. | ||
* Panoply of the Maiden of Battles Form: Instead of free weapons, weapons without willpower cost. -[[User:Sunrunner|sunrunner]] 20:17, 9 November 2009 (PST) | * Panoply of the Maiden of Battles Form: Instead of free weapons, weapons without willpower cost. -[[User:Sunrunner|sunrunner]] 20:17, 9 November 2009 (PST) | ||
** Give Lance/Shield/Sword Reflexive and/or no wp cost? -[[User:Andrensath|Andrensath]] 17:50, 10 November 2009 (NZDT) | ** Give Lance/Shield/Sword Reflexive and/or no wp cost? -[[User:Andrensath|Andrensath]] 17:50, 10 November 2009 (NZDT) | ||
+ | **[[Taurus II]]: I like Andrensath's suggestion. |
Revision as of 23:27, 9 November 2009
Comments
- If it is a native style for Loom 2.0 Sidereals, then any Loom 2.0 Sidereal would be able to create custom charms for the style. -sunrunner 20:17, 9 November 2009 (PST)
- Suggested fix: 'This Style is considered native for any Chosen of Battles using charms from Loom 2.0'. -Andrensath 17:50, 10 November 2009 (NZDT)
- Taurus II: Using Loom 2.0 evades the Sidereal prohibition on developing custom charms? Really?
- Shield of the Battle Maiden should be (+Essence) to Parry DV, and with no mobility penalty.
- That sounds fine to me. -Andrensath 17:50, 10 November 2009 (NZDT)
- Taurus II: Ditto.
- Guise of the Judge Form: No botches. Try external penalty of "number" for "number" actions. -sunrunner 20:17, 9 November 2009 (PST)
- Stylist's (MA+Ess)/2 external penalty for Stylist's (MA+Ess)/2 actions, maybe? -Andrensath 17:50, 10 November 2009 (NZDT)
- Taurus II: Can you explain why botches aren't allowed? I figured that, given the limitation that the Stylist has to be participating in the contest, and that she is as vulnerable (mechanics-wise) to the effect as her opponent, it'd be okay.
- Panoply of the Maiden of Battles Form: Instead of free weapons, weapons without willpower cost. -sunrunner 20:17, 9 November 2009 (PST)
- Give Lance/Shield/Sword Reflexive and/or no wp cost? -Andrensath 17:50, 10 November 2009 (NZDT)
- Taurus II: I like Andrensath's suggestion.