SatCoC player Bill: Difference between revisions

From RPGnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Aloysius Dees, who appears as an example earlier in this
The four Types are simple classifications of the horrific
chapter, is a Breeder. He’s a maker of life, in the form of
endeavors of The Batmans: Feeder, Breeder, Collector, and
homonculi constructed from the bones of children. Dr.
Teacher.
Victor Frankenstein is also a Breeder. And both of them are
And although some few examples from history, film and
Brain Aspected. Theirs are cerebral endeavors, journeys into
literature will be given for each of the Types, it should be
the hidden recesses of the natural world driven by instinct.
noted that thinking of the Types as a rigid classification
Dr. Moreau is also certainly a Breeder, but his Aspect is a hard
scheme is counter-productive, and ultimately unsatisfying.
one to determine. As played by Charles Laughton in The
Fictional characters, historical figures, and even finalized
Island of Lost Souls, he has the gentility and rationalization of
The Batmans will defy classification, when considered in
objective or scientific good that you get with a Brain Aspected
retrospect. Your group may realize, for instance, after
The Batman. But his method is primal and brutal and personal.
having settled on specific Needs and Wants, that the
And his Wants are the same as those of Dees and
Collector The Batman you thought you were creating is actually
Frankenstein, for the respect of his peers, which should be
more of a Feeder.
considered atypical for a Beast.
Don’t be concerned if something like this happens. Allow
Type and Aspect to get the conversation started and the more
game-impacting details of a The Batman’s Needs and Wants will
be produced from the discussion almost without conscious
effort.
So, that said, the Feeder Type is pretty much about personal
sustenance, at the expense of the Townspeople. A Feeder’s
Need might, like that of a vampire, be for nourishment to
sustain physical vitality, or it might be a monstrous
addiction, perhaps borne out of vanity, like the Countess
Elizabeth Bathory’s obsession with the topical application of
blood to counteract aging. She is unarguably a Feeder of the
Beast Type.
But vampires have to be considered the archetype of Feeder.
Though when you start thinking about Aspect relative to
cinematic and literary vampires, you begin to see why it’s a
bad idea to treat Type-Aspect combinations as a classification
system for sorting established The Batmans. Their Aspects seem
to depend on the movie. Bela Lugosi’s interpretation of
Dracula is pretty much Feeder-Brain. You can almost
imagine him swabbing Mina’s neck with alcohol before he
bites her. For Feeder-Beasts, you have both Antonio
Banderas’ sensual interpretation of Armand in Interview
with the Vampire, and the vicious Jared Nomak in Blade II.
And when you consider that Dracula is also engaged in the
creation of horrific ‘children,’ it’s not hard to imagine a
vampire who’s actually more Breeder than Feeder.

Revision as of 17:53, 8 August 2008

The four Types are simple classifications of the horrific endeavors of The Batmans: Feeder, Breeder, Collector, and Teacher. And although some few examples from history, film and literature will be given for each of the Types, it should be noted that thinking of the Types as a rigid classification scheme is counter-productive, and ultimately unsatisfying. Fictional characters, historical figures, and even finalized The Batmans will defy classification, when considered in retrospect. Your group may realize, for instance, after having settled on specific Needs and Wants, that the Collector The Batman you thought you were creating is actually more of a Feeder. Don’t be concerned if something like this happens. Allow Type and Aspect to get the conversation started and the more game-impacting details of a The Batman’s Needs and Wants will be produced from the discussion almost without conscious effort. So, that said, the Feeder Type is pretty much about personal sustenance, at the expense of the Townspeople. A Feeder’s Need might, like that of a vampire, be for nourishment to sustain physical vitality, or it might be a monstrous addiction, perhaps borne out of vanity, like the Countess Elizabeth Bathory’s obsession with the topical application of blood to counteract aging. She is unarguably a Feeder of the Beast Type. But vampires have to be considered the archetype of Feeder. Though when you start thinking about Aspect relative to cinematic and literary vampires, you begin to see why it’s a bad idea to treat Type-Aspect combinations as a classification system for sorting established The Batmans. Their Aspects seem to depend on the movie. Bela Lugosi’s interpretation of Dracula is pretty much Feeder-Brain. You can almost imagine him swabbing Mina’s neck with alcohol before he bites her. For Feeder-Beasts, you have both Antonio Banderas’ sensual interpretation of Armand in Interview with the Vampire, and the vicious Jared Nomak in Blade II. And when you consider that Dracula is also engaged in the creation of horrific ‘children,’ it’s not hard to imagine a vampire who’s actually more Breeder than Feeder.