Editing After The Storm:Development
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
− | |||
Originally posted on Development thread, post 123 page 13 by Potted Plant | Originally posted on Development thread, post 123 page 13 by Potted Plant | ||
Line 42: | Line 40: | ||
==About posting frequence and advancement of the scene== | ==About posting frequence and advancement of the scene== | ||
− | + | Yup, I do not generally get involved in character to character conversations as a GM, unless there is an NPC involved in the conversation. Or there is a potential action scene building up, such as the bad guys trying to spy on the conversation or something. | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
As for swifter posting speed, when it comes to action scenes I generally do not advance the scene until everyone has posted. But in conversation scenes, I do not see it as much of a problem if the conversation rolls on before everyone has posted. It happens in real life conversations too. A couple of people may have a swift back and forth before others join in again. | As for swifter posting speed, when it comes to action scenes I generally do not advance the scene until everyone has posted. But in conversation scenes, I do not see it as much of a problem if the conversation rolls on before everyone has posted. It happens in real life conversations too. A couple of people may have a swift back and forth before others join in again. | ||
Line 52: | Line 47: | ||
So in my opinion, if some people happen to be online at the same time and have a character conversation going on, They are free to have that conversation, even if it takes multiple posts before anyone else chimes in. But I think that it is fair that if other people get online later on and someone feels "darn, at that point my character would have said something" then they can retroactively post "at this point my character would have said this". If it would drastically change how the conversation went on, we can have a swift OOC talk about how the entire conversation went on, for example if some comments were actually made a bit earlier or later. And if necessary, have a wrap-up post of the conversation. | So in my opinion, if some people happen to be online at the same time and have a character conversation going on, They are free to have that conversation, even if it takes multiple posts before anyone else chimes in. But I think that it is fair that if other people get online later on and someone feels "darn, at that point my character would have said something" then they can retroactively post "at this point my character would have said this". If it would drastically change how the conversation went on, we can have a swift OOC talk about how the entire conversation went on, for example if some comments were actually made a bit earlier or later. And if necessary, have a wrap-up post of the conversation. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |