|
|
| (10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | The absolute best example of a Collector Type The Batman has to
| + | |
| − | be P.T. Barnum. The distinction between the Brain and
| |
| − | Beast Aspects for Collector Type The Batmans is at the level of
| |
| − | why they collect what they collect. Barnum personifies the
| |
| − | Brain Aspect by his aggregation of freaks seemingly out of
| |
| − | twisted cerebral motives simply to have and be known for
| |
| − | having the most impressive collection. In contrast, a Beast
| |
| − | Aspected Collector is typically working toward some kind of
| |
| − | monstrous self-reinvention. Buffalo Bill, from Silence of the
| |
| − | Lambs, just barely qualifies, in that he has very specific
| |
| − | requirements for each of the components of his collection,
| |
| − | and criteria for determining when the collection is complete.
| |
| − | This is what differentiates the Collector from the Feeder.
| |
| − | The extent to which Countess Bathory is indiscriminate in
| |
| − | who she gets blood from, and lacks a vision of somehow
| |
| − | achieving an aesthetically satisfying state of completeness, is
| |
| − | the extent to which she falls more into the Feeder Type.
| |
