Difference between revisions of "User talk:Argyle"
Brad Elliott (talk | contribs) (Thanks, Argyle!) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
I'll second the motion that it doesn't hurt anything. Plus, if people come looking for good explinations of what an RPG is, we should be a good place to explain it. I just don't want it taking up too much "header space" in the major pages -- but that doesn't seem to be a problem so far. | I'll second the motion that it doesn't hurt anything. Plus, if people come looking for good explinations of what an RPG is, we should be a good place to explain it. I just don't want it taking up too much "header space" in the major pages -- but that doesn't seem to be a problem so far. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Thanks, Argyle! == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I, too, don't mind if this is the Wikipedia for RPGs. | ||
| + | |||
| + | And thanks, Argyle - I appreciate your tidying up my very first attempts at meddling with a wiki, and moving the free-copying note. That was cool of you. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'll never malign your socks again. ;) | ||
Revision as of 17:30, 14 May 2005
Dictionary Definitions
Uhm... could you please not turn RPGnet's wiki into a Wikipedia? I think we all know what a GM is, what the d20 system is, et multiple cetera. -_-; Almafeta 14:00, 7 May 2005 (PDT)
What's the harm?
Why not? It's not like it's hurting anything.
Seconded
I'll second the motion that it doesn't hurt anything. Plus, if people come looking for good explinations of what an RPG is, we should be a good place to explain it. I just don't want it taking up too much "header space" in the major pages -- but that doesn't seem to be a problem so far.
Thanks, Argyle!
I, too, don't mind if this is the Wikipedia for RPGs.
And thanks, Argyle - I appreciate your tidying up my very first attempts at meddling with a wiki, and moving the free-copying note. That was cool of you.
I'll never malign your socks again. ;)
