Editing Talk:MTH:Merits

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 3: Line 3:
 
Equipment has been moved to it's own section. Look for the link on the Merits page.
 
Equipment has been moved to it's own section. Look for the link on the Merits page.
 
----
 
----
βˆ’
If looking for Limit Break and related merits, these where deleted as they duplicate Enhancement Merits with more complicated rules and lower prerequisites.
+
Equipment was deleted entirely, as all equipment listed there already existed in published material. We DO need a section for equipment though, for Superhero-type equipment that doesn't yet have rules, and to better-categorize some merits. -BunniRabbi
 +
----
 +
Hyper-Punch was added back because there need to be rules for creating forced movement with blows backed by super strength. It's unique, but very commonplace in the superhero genre.
 +
----
 +
Hyper-Punch was removed again due to it duplicating two other separate merits. These merits where then consolidated into the Wrecker Fighting Style with similar merits. -BunniRabbi
  
βˆ’
== System Eloquence ==
+
Also, it was brought to my attention today that forced movement rules are implied as an option under Stylish Execution. If so, we should probably make that more explicit in the section detailing Stylish Execution. I have mixed feelings as to weather forced movement should be something you get through optional mechanics, like merit, or narrative default mechanic, like Stylish Execution. Thoughts?
  
βˆ’
Before adding a new merit, please check to see if it already exists. If it could be a simple variation of an (published) existing merit, add that to the Expanded Merits section. If it could exist as part of an expanded version of a merit on this wiki, expand that entry. Only if neither of these options are available should you add a merit to this section. Otherwise we get a lot of clutter and redundancy. Almost half the merits we see added here are later deleted because they already existed.
+
----
 +
What the fuck is wrong with you?
 +
 
 +
Forced movement rules are not implied as an option under Stylish Execution, MUCH LESS detailed in any way that is useable.
 +
 
 +
Stop treating this wiki as though you own it. Stop deleting things because of the slightest overlap with other things. Hyper-Punch was /nothing/ like Shockwave or Thunderclap, which should not be part of a fighting style. You are aware people are running games with these rules, right? Can you imagine how frustrating it is to have them changed drastically and told that it's because a merit 'duplicates' something it unequivocally does not?

Please note that all contributions to RPGnet may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see RPGnet:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)