Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 81: |
Line 81: |
| | | |
| [[User:Adalger|Adalger]] 20:46, 3 Jun 2005 (PDT) | | [[User:Adalger|Adalger]] 20:46, 3 Jun 2005 (PDT) |
− |
| |
− | Perhaps an abbreviated definition can be put on the Lexica pages and the word itself can be used as a link to the more complete definition?
| |
− |
| |
− | ;[[Module]]: A store-bought adventure.
| |
− |
| |
− | Something like that? What say you?
| |
− | [[User:Argyle|Argyle]] 22:20, 6 Jun 2005 (PDT)
| |
− |
| |
− | I stand by the logic of my original suggestion: the formal and informal terminology are both subcategories of terminology, and would work better with discrete pages for each definition. That way, wiki links to, for example, Borgstromancy or Rule Zero would work. I've seen a couple of attempted links to "Lexica" terms already, and think it would work more like everyone will expect it to if we give each term its own page.
| |
− |
| |
− | That said, I'm not trying to ''impose'' this view on anyone. If nobody else wants to do it that way, that's fine by me. But what you suggest seems almost exactly like having a Category page artificially created instead of using the built-in mechanism MediaWiki provides.
| |
− |
| |
− | [[User:Adalger|Adalger]] 04:57, 7 Jun 2005 (PDT)
| |
− |
| |
− | == Notability ==
| |
− |
| |
− | I'm not sure what criteria shold be used for adding terms to this lexica, but I noticed a google for the term "OGL Heartbreaker" only provides a link back to this page. Should we have some standard that ensures relatively notable terms are added. [[User:217.43.211.241|217.43.211.241]] 09:32, 11 Jun 2005 (PDT)
| |