Difference between revisions of "Talk:Scratch"

From RPGnet
Jump to: navigation, search
(stuff to do when delayed)
m (Reverted edits by 201.155.102.64 (talk) to last revision by BFGalbraith)
 
(193 intermediate revisions by 30 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==movement abilities should be more useful when escaping==
+
==Toughness is Overpowered==
 +
As the Scratch system has evolved, hit points have gradually increased relative to the damage of attack abilities, so everybody wants to be a tank because hit points guarantee you will last longer.
  
Movement abilities are not as useful as they should be when escaping.
+
Currently our official average hit points are about right (3 for an unarmored average person, 4 or 5 for a "squishy" PC, 6 or more for a tank) and the power of our attack abilities is about right (some people say they are too powerful, some say they have been nerfed, so that suggests we have hit the sweet spot.)
Only hold and getting incapacitated can prevent you from escaping.
 
The movement ability bonus to agility does not help you avoid holds, and you lose the bonus once you are held. Ideas for making movement abilities more useful while escaping:
 
  
*add movement abilities to strength when you evade
+
So how do we tweak the incentives so that squishy characters will be happy with 4 or 5 hit points, but tanks will still want to have lots of hit points?
**This is my favorite of these options.--[[User:BFGalbraith|BFGalbraith]] 01:09, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 
**What if it also added to your intelligence while evading?--[[User:BFGalbraith|BFGalbraith]] 01:09, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 
***it would make it harder to delay you with a distract action while evading
 
****evading the distraction makes narrative sense
 
****this helps you escape because delaying prevents escape
 
***it would make it harder to panic you with a surprise or delay action while evading
 
****does not help you escape - panicked characters can still evade and escape.
 
****keeps you from having to evade again or escape next turn
 
****does evading a surprise make narrative sense?
 
****does evading intimidation make narrative sense?
 
*hold against an evading character has to roll higher than both agility and strength
 
*hold always has to roll higher than both agility and strength
 
  
==describing actions that can only be used once per encounter==
+
We already have the engage action, which helps tanks absorb damage by drawing aggro. In playtesting, healers are more likely to be targeted by holds than high-damage attacks, so wrestling (to increase strength) might actually be better for healers than lots of toughness. Healers and long-range attackers can also take cover.
  
Should we define "unrepeatable" actions as actions that can only be used once per encounter, or should we just say that the action can only be used once per encounter in each case?
+
====Bug to Feature====
  
==holding the person who is holding you==
+
Context could play a big part here, because this problem is likely to be fixed by the skill system intended for Squawk 2nd Ed.  TDW might be the last game in the foreseeable future that uses Scratch without skills.  ''In TDW, there is a really good narrative to why PCs should gain toughness more often than other abilities'', which the following text could be added to TDW to explain:
 +
:Essence often warps Sorcerers into more powerful forms, increasing their size, natural armor, or other physical alterations that make them more physically resilient.  Therefore, it is appropriate for Sorcerers to use essence to gain Toughness more often than other abilities.
 +
If we go with this option, this Toughness balance issue can be tabled until we are using skills in Scratch.
  
The big risk of getting someone in a hold in real-life is that they can also grab you, immobilizing you as well, even if they have an inferior hold. So you should be able to hold someone who is holding you. Should you be able to do this whenever you are delayed or only when you are delayed by a hold?
+
====Real Solution====
  
==taking cover while reloading==
+
What if we had a rule for all injured or incapacitated characters (including minions) that between encounters they only heal to barely-healthy, unless they can make a detection, craftsmanship or healing roll to regenerate themselves to full HP?
  
It makes sense for someone to be using the same cover they had before, even if their projectile weapon has a lot of kick or takes a while to reload. So should you be able to take cover when you are delayed by your own shooting or blasting attack, or should you only be able to STAY in cover when you are delayed by your own shooting or blasting attack?
+
:This would decrease the guarantee that hit points make you last longer, which would be good.
  
==grid movement when you are delayed by your own moves==
+
:Can you use your roll to heal an ally instead of yourself?
  
*Being delayed by your own knockout, shooting or blasting shouldn't keep you from moving.
+
::"Yes" makes more narrative sense IMHO. --[[User:BFGalbraith|BFGalbraith]] 10:17, 25 June 2011 (PDT)
*Getting delayed by a hold action should keep you from moving.
 
*Should being delayed by a distract action keep you from moving?
 
*Should we distinguish delayed vs. delayed + immobilized with technical terms?
 
  
==balance between abilities==
+
:This should be the rule for a "normal" encounter cycle. Depending on the game this could mean a short rest, a month or a year of rehabilitation. Within each game there may be some back-to-back encounters without the opportunity to heal, and there may be longer breaks or full healing services at some points in a long campaign (i.e. "return to town".)
  
Here's how I estimate the approximate value of each ability at each level. This scale is adjusted so that 1 level of an attack ability is worth 1. It's not exactly the same as the CP scale.
+
:The normal encounter cycle should also be the cycle for changing craftsmanship bonuses.
  
{|style="text-align:center;"
+
:You should not be able to respec minions in the normal encounter cycle. You need a longer break ("return to town") to replace, modify or retrain your minions.
!ability!!1!!2!!3!!4!!5!!6!!7!!8!!9!!10!!explanation
 
|-
 
|toughness<br>(1&frac12;&nbsp;/&nbsp;level avg from level 4 to 10)||-15||-5||0||3||5||7||9||11||12||13
 
|style="text-align:left;"|
 
*none of the other abilities are useful when you are incapacitated
 
*attack abilities are less useful when you are injured
 
*Toughness is especially valuable at low levels when you have a high risk of getting injured or incapacitated by each attack.
 
|-
 
|attack abilities,<br>craftsmanship, healing ||1||2||3||4||5||6||7||8||9||10
 
|style="text-align:left;"|
 
*+5 for your first attack ability because it doubles attack power when healthy
 
*+5 for healing (potentially heals several points of damage.)
 
*+1 for craftsmanship versatility?
 
|-
 
|stalking abilities||1||2||3||4||5||6||7||8||9||10
 
|style="text-align:left;"|
 
*+1 for your first stalking ability (surprise action)
 
*Stealth and detection give you an up-front initiative bonus.
 
*The huge detection bonus to initiative makes up for the difference between the value of agility and intelligence.
 
|-
 
|movement abilities<br>(&frac34;&nbsp;/&nbsp;level) ||&frac34;||1&frac12;||2&frac14;||3||3&frac34;||4&frac12;||5&frac14;||6||6&frac34;||7&frac12;
 
|style="text-align:left;"|
 
*+5 for flying because non-flying characters can't hit you with close range attacks when you evade or use a long range attack
 
*+&frac12; for swimming because non-swimmers and long-range attacks can't hit you when you use swimming to evade
 
*swimming gives you strength instead of agility, but both attack and agility in water
 
|-
 
|command<br>(2&frac12;&nbsp;/&nbsp;level avg)||3||5||7||9||11||13||16||19||22||25
 
|style="text-align:left;"|
 
*If you have 2 minions, you can do 3 actions per turn
 
*You can cause up to 12 damage in a single turn (knockout)
 
*You can cause up to 9 damage every turn (blasting)
 
|}
 
  
===command is overpowered===
+
==more realistic healing options==
 
 
Here's my logic for evaluating command ability: At level 10 you can have two 5 CP minions with 1 attack ability level and 4 toughness. These are probably the optimum attack-oriented minions, or close to it. They have above-average, normal-for-PCs toughness. They let you attack three times as often, tripling your success rate. the average success rate for attacks is 55%, so tripling that adds 110%, or in other words it's like 22 attack ability levels. Adding 3 more levels for the intimidate action (10 vs. intelligence at level 10.) gives a total value of 25.
 
 
 
This is probably an over-estimation of the value of command ability. Command ability minions cannot be healed, and they can be injured more easily than a powerful PC (the sort that would have 10 command ability.) Also note that the value of command ability above level 10 slows down to 1 / level. Still, it seems like each level of command ability is almost twice as valuable as each level of attack ability.
 
 
 
===are movement abilities powerful enough?===
 
 
 
*movement ability levels are less valuable than attack ability levels
 
**agility does not protect you against all attacks
 
**evade is only used in tight spots
 
**movement ability holds do not cause damage like wrestling
 
 
 
==distraction abilities==
 
 
 
You should be able to add ANY ability level except for toughness to a distract roll (close range delay attack vs. intelligence)
 
 
 
Pro:
 
 
 
*distract does not currently have an ability bonus
 
*toughness is by far the most useful ability
 
*players can have fun inventing their own tricks for distracting enemies
 
 
 
Con:
 
 
 
*vague narrative
 
*a player can throw a random ability at an enemy, leaving other players scratching their heads about what happened.
 
 
 
This is a sort of "attack by role-playing."
 
 
 
:Some abilities seem more suited to distract than others: acrobatics, detection, stealth, command seem much more appropriate than craftsmanship and healing.  In between are the combat abilities and other movement abilities. --[[User:BFGalbraith|BFGalbraith]] 04:54, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 
 
 
::Movement abilities seem like they would be useful for distracting in environments where they can be used to evade. If these were the ONLY abilities that could be used for distraction, this would help balance the abilities (downside: stealth could not be used for distraction) --[[User:SerpLord|SerpLord]] 14:32, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 
 
 
::: I like the idea of only using movement abilities for distraction.  While it does not explain why some abilitiy's can NOT be used for distraction, it does not do a greater evil, which is to have an explaination-defying selection of abilities do distraction.  IMHO this is our best choice so far for haviing ability bonuses apply to distraction. --[[User:BFGalbraith|BFGalbraith]] 04:15, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 
  
==more realistic healing options==
+
Note: the three main scratch projects right now (TDW, HoW, Squawk 2nd Ed.) are fantasy/sci-fi with lots of explanations for "unrealistic healing."  IMHO this rule may be decided on in the not-near future.--[[User:BFGalbraith|BFGalbraith]] 14:31, 20 June 2011 (PDT)
  
 
games without healing ability (dinosaurs and prehistoric animals)
 
games without healing ability (dinosaurs and prehistoric animals)
Line 146: Line 66:
 
==optional death rules==
 
==optional death rules==
  
realistic or brutal games like Resilience might have death rules that add dramatic tension and character expendability.
+
realistic or brutal games like [[Resilience]] might have death rules that add dramatic tension and character expendability.

Latest revision as of 01:17, 30 June 2011

Toughness is Overpowered[edit]

As the Scratch system has evolved, hit points have gradually increased relative to the damage of attack abilities, so everybody wants to be a tank because hit points guarantee you will last longer.

Currently our official average hit points are about right (3 for an unarmored average person, 4 or 5 for a "squishy" PC, 6 or more for a tank) and the power of our attack abilities is about right (some people say they are too powerful, some say they have been nerfed, so that suggests we have hit the sweet spot.)

So how do we tweak the incentives so that squishy characters will be happy with 4 or 5 hit points, but tanks will still want to have lots of hit points?

We already have the engage action, which helps tanks absorb damage by drawing aggro. In playtesting, healers are more likely to be targeted by holds than high-damage attacks, so wrestling (to increase strength) might actually be better for healers than lots of toughness. Healers and long-range attackers can also take cover.

Bug to Feature[edit]

Context could play a big part here, because this problem is likely to be fixed by the skill system intended for Squawk 2nd Ed. TDW might be the last game in the foreseeable future that uses Scratch without skills. In TDW, there is a really good narrative to why PCs should gain toughness more often than other abilities, which the following text could be added to TDW to explain:

Essence often warps Sorcerers into more powerful forms, increasing their size, natural armor, or other physical alterations that make them more physically resilient. Therefore, it is appropriate for Sorcerers to use essence to gain Toughness more often than other abilities.

If we go with this option, this Toughness balance issue can be tabled until we are using skills in Scratch.

Real Solution[edit]

What if we had a rule for all injured or incapacitated characters (including minions) that between encounters they only heal to barely-healthy, unless they can make a detection, craftsmanship or healing roll to regenerate themselves to full HP?

This would decrease the guarantee that hit points make you last longer, which would be good.
Can you use your roll to heal an ally instead of yourself?
"Yes" makes more narrative sense IMHO. --BFGalbraith 10:17, 25 June 2011 (PDT)
This should be the rule for a "normal" encounter cycle. Depending on the game this could mean a short rest, a month or a year of rehabilitation. Within each game there may be some back-to-back encounters without the opportunity to heal, and there may be longer breaks or full healing services at some points in a long campaign (i.e. "return to town".)
The normal encounter cycle should also be the cycle for changing craftsmanship bonuses.
You should not be able to respec minions in the normal encounter cycle. You need a longer break ("return to town") to replace, modify or retrain your minions.

more realistic healing options[edit]

Note: the three main scratch projects right now (TDW, HoW, Squawk 2nd Ed.) are fantasy/sci-fi with lots of explanations for "unrealistic healing." IMHO this rule may be decided on in the not-near future.--BFGalbraith 14:31, 20 June 2011 (PDT)

games without healing ability (dinosaurs and prehistoric animals)

hardcore

  • HP never goes up during combat
    • damage always represents injuries that take a long time to heal.
    • It never represents physical or psychic pain, suffocation or stunning effects that people can recover from during combat. (This could make the rule incompatible with some settings or other optional rules like skills.)
  • healing still used in combat with death rules?
    • does first aid remove the healer from combat?
      • NO, either you can use healing as a combat action or you don't use healing until hostilities stop. This is all about how you interpret the duration of combat.
        • If you insist on a very quick flow of combat without pauses for maneuvering and orientation (combat takes seconds), then there is not time in a battle to treat multiple injured allies, and it is not necessary or even appropriate to treat injured allies during combat.
        • If combat turns are more like camera shots in an action movie and clashes in a real fight, which are interrupted by pauses and maneuvers that vary in duration (combat takes minutes), there is time in a battle to treat multiple injured allies or treat an ally and then return fire at an enemy.

milder

  • you can only be healed from being incapacitated once per battle. We could give this state a name, like convalescent or wounded.
  • we could also limit each healer to healing one character form injured to healthy once per battle.

healing between battles

  • everybody heals to stamina + 1 between battles (balance and stability - game designers know you will have most of your HP when you enter a battle.)
  • make toughness roll to heal yourself to full HP
  • make healing roll for each ally to heal them to full HP

healing skills

  • special healing skills might be able to heal you when normal healing actions cannot.
  • special toughness skills might allow you to be healed more often.
  • toughness skills that help you be healed?

optional death rules[edit]

realistic or brutal games like Resilience might have death rules that add dramatic tension and character expendability.