Editing Chancel Amyra:Ftisk v3

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
====DRAFT!!!====
 +
 
[[Chancel_Amyra]]
 
[[Chancel_Amyra]]
  
Line 8: Line 10:
  
 
[[Chancel_Amyra:Ftisk_v3|Machinery and Data (3rd Edition) (last)]]
 
[[Chancel_Amyra:Ftisk_v3|Machinery and Data (3rd Edition) (last)]]
 +
  
 
===Wounds===
 
===Wounds===
Line 56: Line 59:
 
* Affliction: I live forever and don’t need to eat or drink but can be killed [3]
 
* Affliction: I live forever and don’t need to eat or drink but can be killed [3]
 
* Bond: I’m curious! / I want to see what is after that corner again and again [3]
 
* Bond: I’m curious! / I want to see what is after that corner again and again [3]
* Bond: I love my dear Theresa as if she was his mum [2]
+
* Bond: I love and care Gnomely [2]
* Bond: I love and care Gnomely [1]
+
* Bond: I hate Dollphaniel [1]
 
* Bond: Sometimes Conrad take over while in creation [1]
 
* Bond: Sometimes Conrad take over while in creation [1]
 
* Bond: Ftisk try to retain control outside creation [1]
 
* Bond: Ftisk try to retain control outside creation [1]
Line 97: Line 100:
  
  
-- chat excerpt 2011-09-09 --<br>
+
-- chat excerpt --
<Angelo> RN, for Ftisk ( http://wiki.rpg.net/index.php/Chancel_Amyra:Ftisk_v3 ) bonds&afflictions and Data definition are good that way?<br>
+
<Angelo> RN, for Ftisk ( http://wiki.rpg.net/index.php/Chancel_Amyra:Ftisk_v3 ) bonds&afflictions and Data definition are good that way?
<Random_Nerd> Let me see.<br>
+
 
<Random_Nerd> "Origins: You lived a Mechanical Snail's life."<br>
+
<Random_Nerd> Let me see.
<Random_Nerd> Heh.<br>
+
 
<Random_Nerd> Hmm.<br>
+
<Random_Nerd> "Origins: You lived a Mechanical Snail's life."
<Random_Nerd> On "machines can't be sentient", does Ftisk not now count as a machine?<br>
+
 
<Random_Nerd> Or Gnomely?<br>
+
<Random_Nerd> Heh.
<Angelo> @RN: Gnomely was created with a change made and Ftisk definitely don't count as one<br>
+
 
<Random_Nerd> But does Gnomely count as a machine now?<br>
+
<Random_Nerd> Hmm.
<Angelo> no, he is not a machine by the definition<br>
+
 
<Random_Nerd> Okay.<br>
+
<Random_Nerd> On "machines can't be sentient", does Ftisk not now count as a machine?
<Random_Nerd> He used to be one, but isn't one any more, then?<br>
+
 
<Random_Nerd> And the "a machine is an object" one, what do you see that as meaning in practice?<br>
+
<Random_Nerd> Or Gnomely?
<Angelo> that can't exist a ephemeral machine, a machine must be made of things<br>
+
 
<Angelo> like wood or electrical pieces or drain pipes<br>
+
<Angelo> @RN: Gnomely was created with a change made and Ftisk definitely don't count as one
<Verithe> A machine must be tangible, not abstract?<br>
+
 
<Angelo> yes Verithe<br>
+
<Random_Nerd> But does Gnomely count as a machine now?
<Random_Nerd> Okay, "a machine must be tangible" works better for that.<br>
+
 
<Random_Nerd> And... hmm, okay, so a computer program wouldn't be a machine?<br>
+
<Angelo> no, he is not a machine by the definition
<Angelo> ok I change the definition<br>
+
 
<Angelo> no I see it as Data not machine<br>
+
<Random_Nerd> Okay.
<Random_Nerd> Okay.<br>
+
 
<Angelo> :-)<br>
+
<Random_Nerd> He used to be one, but isn't one any more, then?
<Random_Nerd> And Data seems fine.<br>
+
 
<Angelo> Super!<br>
+
<Random_Nerd> And the "a machine is an object" one, what do you see that as meaning in practice?
<Random_Nerd> I see you went with the Bond version of Conrad taking over.<br>
+
 
<Angelo> Yep, less load on the HG<br>
+
<Angelo> that can't exist a ephemeral machine, a machine must be made of things
<Lazarus> Computer programs always seemed to me to be less machinery and more "procedures" or somethign like that that Vulcan probably also owns<br>
+
 
<Random_Nerd> Well, I could see a version of Machinery that included them.<br>
+
<Angelo> like wood or electrical pieces or drain pipes
<Random_Nerd> Oh, one more question about machinery.<br>
+
 
<Random_Nerd> Can machines be naturally occuring, under this definition?<br>
+
<Verithe> A machine must be tangible, not abstract?
<Angelo> on Gnomely I was under the convinction that making him with Machinery with a change that put it outside of machinery leave him in the machinery domain<br>
+
 
<Random_Nerd> Or do they have to be made by a person?<br>
+
<Angelo> yes Verithe
<Angelo> uhm My idea is that they are purposefull made<br>
+
 
<Random_Nerd> Hmm.  You might want to devote a quality to that.<br>
+
<Random_Nerd> Okay, "a machine must be tangible" works better for that.
<Angelo> yes sound right<br>
+
 
<Angelo> or change -A machine must be done by 2 or more pieces working together- to -A machine must be done by a being with 2 or more pieces working together-<br>
+
<Random_Nerd> And... hmm, okay, so a computer program wouldn't be a machine?
<Angelo> would work?<br>
+
 
<Random_Nerd> Hmm.<br>
+
<Angelo> ok I change the definition
<Random_Nerd> "Must be made by a sentient being out of two or more pieces?"<br>
+
 
<Angelo> cool!<br>
+
<Angelo> no I see it as Data not machine
<Random_Nerd> Okay, let's see.<br>
+
 
<Random_Nerd> Anything else, before we start?<br>
+
<Random_Nerd> Okay.
 +
 
 +
<Angelo> :-)
 +
 
 +
<Random_Nerd> And Data seems fine.
 +
 
 +
<Angelo> Super!
 +
 
 +
<Random_Nerd> I see you went with the Bond version of Conrad taking over.
 +
 
 +
<Angelo> Yep, less load on the HG
 +
 
 +
<Lazarus> Computer programs always seemed to me to be less machinery and more "procedures" or somethign like that that Vulcan probably also owns
 +
 
 +
<Random_Nerd> Well, I could see a version of Machinery that included them.
 +
 
 +
<Random_Nerd> Oh, one more question about machinery.
 +
 
 +
<Random_Nerd> Can machines be naturally occuring, under this definition?
 +
 
 +
<Angelo> on Gnomely I was under the convinction that making him with Machinery with a change that put it outside of machinery leave him in the machinery domain
 +
 
 +
<Random_Nerd> Or do they have to be made by a person?
 +
 
 +
<Angelo> uhm My idea is that they are purposefull made
 +
 
 +
<Random_Nerd> Hmm.  You might want to devote a quality to that.
 +
 
 +
<Angelo> yes sound right
 +
 
 +
<Angelo> or change -A machine must be done by 2 or more pieces working together- to -A machine must be done by a being with 2 or more pieces working together-
 +
 
 +
<Angelo> would work?
 +
 
 +
<Random_Nerd> Hmm.
 +
 
 +
<Random_Nerd> "Must be made by a sentient being out of two or more pieces?"
 +
 
 +
<Angelo> cool!
 +
 
 +
<Random_Nerd> Okay, let's see.
 +
 
 +
<Random_Nerd> Anything else, before we start?
 +
 
 
<Angelo> nope :-)
 
<Angelo> nope :-)
  

Please note that all contributions to RPGnet may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see RPGnet:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)