Editing Parliament No-Quorum

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 8: Line 8:
 
A tentative agreement was made between the Sino-Block and members of the Abstention to radically scale back Alliance operations until the crisis in the Parliament is over. Without returning to Parliament, they've begun drafting a new '' '''Planetary Bill of Rights and Autonomy''''' . This document would guarantee the planetary leaders rights to veto Alliance interventions without an order of a super majority (66% of the Parliament, or 137 votes). The House Majority Leader, Lord Holbrook, argued that this was tantamount to a retroactive surrender of the Unification War. The members of the Sino-Block and Abstention argue that this bill directly follows from the Declaration of Universal Rights, and agreements of Unification, but better distinguishes the responsibilities of the Alliance as a whole from its constituent planets.<br>
 
A tentative agreement was made between the Sino-Block and members of the Abstention to radically scale back Alliance operations until the crisis in the Parliament is over. Without returning to Parliament, they've begun drafting a new '' '''Planetary Bill of Rights and Autonomy''''' . This document would guarantee the planetary leaders rights to veto Alliance interventions without an order of a super majority (66% of the Parliament, or 137 votes). The House Majority Leader, Lord Holbrook, argued that this was tantamount to a retroactive surrender of the Unification War. The members of the Sino-Block and Abstention argue that this bill directly follows from the Declaration of Universal Rights, and agreements of Unification, but better distinguishes the responsibilities of the Alliance as a whole from its constituent planets.<br>
 
= March 15th, 2520 =  
 
= March 15th, 2520 =  
βˆ’
The ''IAV Dortmunder'' was fired upon by the ''IAV Yamato'' after the ''Dortmunder'' interdicted a Parliamentary ship traveling to Blue Sun. The ''Dortmunder'' did not return fire, and the incident was resolved peacefully, although 14 crewmen about the ''Dortmunder'' were killed, and dozen injured. The ''Dortmunder'' claimed the ship, The ''Dilong'', broadcasting a parliamentary beacon refused to stop for the Quarantine. The ''Yamato'' claimed it was responding to a treasonous kidnapping attempt. The MP, Shun Chow Fu (Sihnon), has refused comment. His spokesperson claimed that there is understandable confusion regarding the chain of command and rights of travel. <br>
+
The IAV Dortmunder was fired upon by the IAV Yamato after the Dortmunder interdicted a Parliamentary ship traveling to Blue Sun. The Dortmunder did not return fire, and the incident was resolved peacefully, although 14 crewmen about the Dortmunder were killed, and dozen injured. The Dortmunder claimed the ship, The Dilong, broadcasting a parliamentary beacon refused to stop for the Quarantine. The Yamato claimed it was responding to a treasonous kidnapping attempt. The MP, Shun Chow Fu (Sihnon), has refused comment. His spokesperson claimed that there is understandable confusion regarding the chain of command and rights of travel. <br>
  
 
= March 23rd, 2520 =  
 
= March 23rd, 2520 =  

Please note that all contributions to RPGnet may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see RPGnet:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)